For years there seemed to be just one single dependable path to store info on your personal computer – working with a disk drive (HDD). Nevertheless, this sort of technology is currently expressing its age – hard disk drives are really loud and slow; they’re power–hungry and are likely to produce quite a lot of heat in the course of intensive operations.
SSD drives, on the contrary, are swift, consume a smaller amount energy and are also far less hot. They feature a completely new method to file accessibility and storage and are years ahead of HDDs relating to file read/write speed, I/O performance as well as power effectivity. Discover how HDDs stand up against the newer SSD drives.
1. Access Time
A result of a revolutionary new approach to disk drive performance, SSD drives permit for much quicker data access speeds. Having an SSD, data file access times are far lower (as little as 0.1 millisecond).
HDD drives still utilize the exact same general data file access technology which was originally created in the 1950s. Even though it has been considerably advanced since then, it’s slow when compared to what SSDs are providing. HDD drives’ data access speed varies between 5 and 8 milliseconds.
2. Random I/O Performance
Caused by the brand–new significant file storage approach shared by SSDs, they furnish quicker file access speeds and swifter random I/O performance.
During our lab tests, all of the SSDs showed their capability to work with a minimum of 6000 IO’s per second.
With an HDD drive, the I/O performance gradually raises the more you apply the hard drive. Having said that, once it extends to a certain restriction, it can’t go quicker. And because of the now–old concept, that I/O limitation is a lot lower than what you can get with an SSD.
HDD are only able to go as far as 400 IO’s per second.
SSD drives don’t have any sort of moving parts, which means there is a lesser amount of machinery included. And the less literally moving components there are, the lower the possibilities of failing are going to be.
The normal rate of failure of any SSD drive is 0.5%.
HDD drives work with rotating hard disks for saving and reading info – a technology going back to the 1950s. With disks magnetically suspended in the air, rotating at 7200 rpm, the prospects of something failing are generally increased.
The common rate of failing of HDD drives varies amongst 2% and 5%.
4. Energy Conservation
SSDs are lacking moving elements and need minimal chilling energy. In addition, they require a small amount of energy to function – lab tests have established that they can be powered by a standard AA battery.
In general, SSDs consume amongst 2 and 5 watts.
From the second they have been designed, HDDs have been very electric power–ravenous devices. Then when you’ve got a hosting server with plenty of HDD drives, this can add to the monthly electricity bill.
Normally, HDDs consume in between 6 and 15 watts.
5. CPU Power
SSD drives permit quicker file accessibility speeds, that, in turn, permit the CPU to perform file requests much quicker and then to go back to different tasks.
The typical I/O wait for SSD drives is only 1%.
HDD drives accommodate sluggish access rates in comparison to SSDs do, resulting in the CPU having to wait around, whilst reserving resources for the HDD to locate and return the demanded file.
The normal I/O wait for HDD drives is just about 7%.
6.Input/Output Request Times
In real life, SSDs function as perfectly as they managed for the duration of our testing. We produced a full platform back–up on one of our production web servers. During the backup procedure, the normal service time for any I/O calls was under 20 ms.
Compared with SSD drives, HDDs feature much slower service times for input/output requests. In a web server backup, the normal service time for an I/O query ranges somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.
7. Backup Rates
Another real–life development is the speed at which the back–up has been produced. With SSDs, a server back–up now will take no more than 6 hours using giantwebhosting’s web server–optimized software.
In contrast, with a web server with HDD drives, a comparable backup might take three or four times as long to finish. An entire backup of an HDD–driven web server typically takes 20 to 24 hours.
To be able to promptly enhance the efficiency of your respective websites while not having to change any kind of code, an SSD–driven website hosting solution is really a good solution. Check giantwebhosting’s Linux hosting packages packages as well as our Linux VPS web hosting packages – these hosting services highlight quick SSD drives and are offered at the best prices.
- Live Demo
- Each of our Virtual Private Servers is configured for you for free. 99.9% network uptime. Full root access to the server.
Compare our prices
- Take a look at our pricing and pick the right Virtual Private Server for your active sites. It is easy to move up to a more advanced VPS Web Hosting package with just a mouse click.
- Compare our hosting plans
- Contact us 7 days a week by email or by making use of the super–fast ticketing system. Our techs are going to respond to all of your requests within 1 hour.